The major appeal of non-fungible tokens (NFTs) is that they enable holders to verify their exclusive ownership of intangible goods such as digital art or music in an immutable and verifiable manner. However, while this technology appears to be revolutionary, the truth is significantly more complicated.
Piracy and plagiarism abound in the NFT market, and consumers tend to be unaware of the copyright and intellectual property regulations that govern their transactions. Here are some things you need to know…
There is a major misperception concerning NFTs that many people hold.
When you purchase an NFT, you are acquiring ownership of a blockchain-based token that merely links to the location of a file, clip, or image. This implies that holders only have the right to own and sell the token, not the copyright to what it links to – unless, of course, you have pre-negotiated with the seller or specific terms were spelled out ahead of time stating that intellectual property rights go with the token.
Nowhere was this more evident than with SpiceDAO, which paid $3.8 million for one of the remaining manuscripts of Alejandro Jodorowsky’s text for his unfinished film version of the famous sci-fi novel “Dune.” SpiceDAO intended to “make the book public (to the degree authorized by law)” and sell to a streaming service a “original animated limited series” based on the book.
The proposal prompted scorn from observers, such as Jamie Powell of the Financial Times, who reminded readers that “purchasing a copy of anything does not guarantee you sole rights to monetise its content.”
According to BuzzFeed, the copyrights for the book’s content “are controlled by numerous artists and their estates,” and the decentralized autonomous organization (DAO) must now persuade the copyright holders to allow them to experiment with the intellectual property.
It is not always apparent who owns the copyright. That is absolutely true of CryptoPunks. According to Eric Paul Rhodes’ research from last July, CryptoPunks developer Larva Labs approved the NFT license in 2019, which would authorize non-commercial usage, excluding earnings of $100,000 from products, but would not allow NFT holders to change the picture. Rhodes discovered that a different licensing agreement was used that omitted provisions for product sales.
In relation to recommendation No. 2, you would definitely not hold the rights to an NFT that was fraudulently issued. Furthermore, if you sell a counterfeit NFT, you might face fines of up to $30,000 for each infringement under Section 504 of the Copyright Act.
Often NFTs are minted without the artist’s consent, which means you’re not only not purchasing from a certified collection, but you’re also purchasing an NFT from someone other than the artist. Nat Puff, a musician, for example, complained that NFTs of her tunes submitted to the music NFT marketplace HitPiece are not hers. As evidence, she reiterated her stance on non-fungible technology: “NFT’s are s**t, and if you support them, you’re indirectly promoting the demise of independent creative.”
If you have any concerns, attempt to locate their Twitter or other online presence to confirm whether or not they are minting NFTs. Many artists will post tweets indicating whether or not they have NFTs for sale. You may also contact the artist and inquire if they own an NFT.
Terms and conditions :
The Bored Ape Yacht Club’s creators, Yuga Labs, also outlined that holders own “the underlying Bored Ape, the Art, completely.” So as long as you can prove that you hold the NFT, Yuga Labs grants you “an unlimited, worldwide license to use, copy and display the purchased Art for the purpose of creating derivative works based upon the Art,” like creating T-shirts – so long as you can prove that you own the token.
Yuga Labs, the designers of the Bored Ape Yacht Club, also said that holders own “the underlying Bored Ape, the Art, fully.” So, as long as you can prove you possess the NFT, Yuga Labs provides you “an unrestricted, global license to use, duplicate, and display the acquired Art for the purpose of making derivative works based upon the Art,” such as T-shirts — as long as you can prove you own the token.
Buying solely from recognised projects is a straightforward approach to avoid fraud in the NFT market. Anyone can right-click and save a hefty NFT, then re-upload it with whatever title they like.
The pull-yourself-up-by-your-bootstraps philosophy of cryptocurrency places the obligation of validating the NFT on the customer. Platforms like OpenSea circumvent this by awarding blue ticks to “certified collections” – you can also verify the contract URL to determine whether an NFT you intend to purchase is from a valid project. Remember that even if someone’s Twitter profile photo has been molded into a hexagon, the NFT may not be from a confirmed project and may be counterfeit.
However, a blue tick is not impenetrable. Proprietors could still scam or quit the project if they so choose.
To summarize all of the above, here’s a checklist for you.
- Check ownership
- Review T&C
- Blue Tick
All of the above checks should be made use of before you invest your money in a hyper surging market of NFTs. You don’t need to buy something just because everyone is buying it. There are many better options out there like Nitro NFMs. Their utility concept is unique and provides good investment for money.
Empowered by all characteristics of NFTs, Nitro NFMs have multiple advanced benefits for its owners which help in increasing their investment. Being a Nitro NFM owner provides you an advantage, even if you decide to sell them. Your returns will increase significantly as a result of its rarity. One of my favorite features from NFMs is the 30 minute reward ecosystem which the company calls an EPOCH where you earn rewards for every thirty minutes depending on the kind of NFM you own. Check out this space to join the NFM club.